07 April, 2006

"Lost" Gospel of Judas Translated

Just as I learned about the Dead Sea Scrolls last weekend, now comes the announcement that a copy of the formerly lost Gospel of Judas has been pieced together and translated.

Some biblical scholars are calling the Gospel of Judas the most significant archaeological discovery in 60 years.

The only known surviving copy of the gospel was found in a codex, or ancient book, that dates back to the third or fourth century A.D.

The newly revealed gospel document, written in Coptic script, is believed to be a translation of the original, a Greek text written by an early Christian sect sometime before A.D. 180.


Judas is totally recast here, going from the ultimate betrayer to the ultimate follower.

Biblical accounts suggest that Jesus foresaw and allowed Judas's betrayal.

As told in the New Testament Gospels, Judas betrayed Jesus for "30 pieces of silver," identifying him with a kiss in front of Roman soldiers. Later the guilt-ridden Judas returns the bribe and commits suicide, according to the Bible.

The Gospel of Judas, however, gives a very different account.

The text begins by announcing that it is the "secret account of the revelation that Jesus spoke in conversation with Judas Iscariot during a week, three days before he celebrated Passover."

It goes on to describe Judas as Jesus' closest friend, someone who understands Christ's true message and is singled out for special status among Jesus' disciples.

In the key passage Jesus tells Judas, "'you will exceed all of them. For you will sacrifice the man that clothes me.'"

Kasser, the translation-project leader, offers an interpretation: "Jesus says it is necessary for someone to free him finally from his human body, and he prefers that this liberation be done by a friend rather than by an enemy.


No doubt Dan Brown is salivating at the chance of wringing another tale with this great discovery and books about the Apocrypha will have to be updated and/or amended. Perhaps Judas Iscariot wasn't carrying John Wilkes Booth down there by the train after all. So why the discrepancies? Who made the decision to go with the betrayal scenario?

No comments: